Another wry report on the behavior and manners of the Thencanic Society. Transcription included.
Murphy, E. T. (Edward Thomas), ca. May 1879-An overall positive report, the first by Robert Earle Anderson (who was 15 in 1896). He gives many of his fellow Thencanic members praise for their debate performance, but recommends one invest in some cough drops. Transcription included.
Anderson, R. Earle (Robert Earle), 1881-1967A brief report in a messy hand, probably by Benjamin Messler (although the signature is almost undecipherable). The critic offers praise and a remark about the ever-turbulent Mr. Camp. Transcription included.
Messler, Benjamin E. (Benjamin Edmund), 1882-1952Perhaps in response to the membership's rowdy behavior, the Thencanic Society established a committee of three students to assign seats for each member. Following a brief report, a chart includes the names of all of the Society's members at this time. Transcription included.
Spilsbury, Persifor G. (Persifor Gybbon), 1882-1959John A. Schultz, Thencanic Secretary, kept this journal of the group's mock legislature for the first months of 1897. In addition to describing the events of and bills introduced at each session of the legislature, he lists each committee, their members, and the state each member represented. Transcription included.
Schultz, John A. (John Anistaki), 1880-1959A humorous report by the Critic, including puns on classmates' names and sly comments on their behavior. Words in (parentheses) are original. Transcription included.
Schultz, John A. (John Anistaki), 1880-1959A positive report of the Thencanic Meeting, most of which recounts a thrilling "tour around the world" by Mr. Camp. Transcription included.
Van Dyke, Ernest C. (Ernest Caldwell), 1879-1932A short, mostly positive recap of the society's meeting. Transcription included.
Hunt, Raymond, 1879-1961Another brief report, albeit a mostly positive one. Transcription included.
Burgess, J. Stewart (John Stewart), 1883-1949Two critic's reports for the same meeting, one rejected and the other accepted. Presumably the first report did not accurately describe the meeting. Unfortunately, no records survive as to why the Officers rejected the first report. Transcription included.
One student, "Dunning," has not been identified as the few mentions of him only include his first name.